PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTPX vs. CREMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
1.31%2.22%3.72%12.00%
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
1.28%7.72%8.09%1.95%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VRTPX having a 1.31% return and CREMX slightly lower at 1.28%.


VRTPX

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
1.31%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*

CREMX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.22%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VRTPX vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CREMX's 5.16% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VRTPX vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTPX
VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CREMX
CREMX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CREMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CREMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CREMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CREMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CREMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTPXCREMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

9.78

-9.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.27

12.29

-12.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

11.91

-10.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

12.82

-12.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.88

85.27

-84.39

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the CREMX Sharpe Ratio of 9.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTPX and CREMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTPXCREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

9.78

-9.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

7.88

-7.66

Correlation

The correlation between VRTPX and CREMX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison

VRTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than CREMX's 6.69% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
3.85%2.79%3.80%3.93%4.52%2.58%3.92%3.50%4.77%1.32%
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
6.69%7.38%7.64%1.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTPX drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTPX and CREMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTPXCREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-0.71%

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-0.55%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

-0.55%

-9.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-0.02%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

0.08%

+3.10%

Volatility

VRTPX vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) at 0.59%. This indicates that VRTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VRTPXCREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

0.59%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

0.65%

+8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

0.89%

+15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

0.96%

+17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

0.96%

+20.96%