PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTPX vs. AWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTPX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTPX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than AWP's 7.40% return.


VRTPX

1D
1.33%
1M
1.16%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.48%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*

AWP

1D
0.78%
1M
0.87%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.02%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTPX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
11.84%2.22%3.72%13.17%-26.14%40.37%-4.65%28.96%-5.99%1.37%
AWP
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
7.40%12.43%12.23%12.58%-37.13%40.41%-10.29%42.52%-18.47%5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTPX and AWP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.68

The correlation between VRTPX and AWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTPX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTPX
VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AWP
AWP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTPX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTPXAWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.74

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

2.87

+1.55

VRTPX vs. AWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the AWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTPX and AWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTPX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTPX drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTPX and AWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTPXAWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-85.93%

+43.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-14.14%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

-23.09%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

-43.93%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-4.09%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-27.32%

+15.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.66%

-1.00%

Volatility

VRTPX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) at 4.75%. This indicates that VRTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTPXAWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.75%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

11.33%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

14.27%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

22.06%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

23.61%

-1.84%

VRTPX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTPX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison

VRTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than AWP's 12.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWP
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
12.37%12.50%12.44%12.37%12.31%7.02%9.13%8.49%12.05%8.90%11.70%10.40%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
3.49%2.79%3.80%3.93%4.52%2.58%3.92%3.50%4.77%1.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTPX and AWP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTPX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to AWP (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTPX dropped -42.33% vs AWP's -85.93%.

VRTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTPX and AWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer