PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTGX vs. NEAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
-2.79%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%21.63%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
12.01%26.99%14.86%38.37%-27.02%38.46%52.49%44.68%-15.64%10.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTGX achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 12.01% return.


VRTGX

1D
4.27%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
-2.79%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
9.83%

NEAIX

1D
4.32%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
12.01%
6M
14.41%
1Y
61.23%
3Y*
27.45%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VRTGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAIX
NEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTGXNEAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

2.17

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.74

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

4.33

-2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

15.43

-10.22

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the NEAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTGX and NEAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTGXNEAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.17

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.65

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.75

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between VRTGX and NEAIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison

VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than NEAIX's 1.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.73%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
1.80%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.84%3.80%10.42%16.35%5.14%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTGX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTGX and NEAIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTGXNEAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-35.93%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-13.98%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

-35.93%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.16%

-7.73%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-8.73%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

3.92%

+0.44%

Volatility

VRTGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) is 8.82%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that VRTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VRTGXNEAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

11.64%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

19.83%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.39%

28.92%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

24.33%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

24.46%

-0.01%