PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTGX vs. ASMOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VRTGX

1D
-1.59%
1M
4.25%
YTD
20.25%
6M
16.70%
1Y
37.69%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
12.16%

ASMOX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.25%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%
ASMOX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund
17.33%16.87%16.54%18.37%-19.56%15.37%25.76%26.47%-12.14%17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTGX and ASMOX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.97

The correlation between VRTGX and ASMOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTGX vs. ASMOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTGXASMOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTGXASMOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

Volatility

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTGXASMOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMOX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTGX vs. ASMOX - Dividend Comparison

VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ASMOX's 7.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMOX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund
7.88%8.12%18.80%3.92%0.57%24.81%5.46%4.38%29.63%9.90%0.79%1.23%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTGX and ASMOX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTGX and ASMOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer