PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRNIX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRNIX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 2.21% return.


VRNIX

1D
1.62%
1M
-0.75%
6M
7.76%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.87%
ALL TIME*
14.53%

SVPFX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.20%
6M
2.00%
YTD
2.21%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.23%16.94%24.44%26.49%-19.19%18.37%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.21%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNIX and SVPFX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.14

Over the past year, VRNIX and SVPFX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRNIX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRNIX
VRNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VRNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VRNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRNIXSVPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

6.52

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

23.79

-15.13

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRNIX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRNIX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRNIXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-6.37%

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-0.91%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-5.32%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-6.37%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

0.00%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-1.88%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.25%

+1.81%

Volatility

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.60%. This indicates that VRNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRNIXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

0.60%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

1.79%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

2.22%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

5.62%

+11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

5.45%

+12.82%

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRNIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRNIX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

VRNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SVPFX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
3.18%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.04%0.82%1.21%1.41%1.59%2.86%1.46%1.65%2.00%1.73%1.93%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRNIX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRNIX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to SVPFX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRNIX dropped -34.57% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRNIX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer