PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRNIX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRNIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 14.42% return.


VRNIX

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.13%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
15.02%
ALL TIME*
14.57%

AMFEX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.46%
6M
8.75%
YTD
14.42%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.91%16.94%24.44%26.49%-19.19%28.64%20.90%31.36%-8.76%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
14.42%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNIX and AMFEX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.96

The correlation between VRNIX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRNIX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRNIX
VRNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VRNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VRNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRNIXAMFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.96

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

16.52

-7.29

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRNIX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRNIX and AMFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRNIXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-30.41%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-6.07%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-15.23%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-21.21%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-4.23%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.46%

+0.60%

Volatility

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.45%. This indicates that VRNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRNIXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.45%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

7.77%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

10.11%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

14.22%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.84%

+1.43%

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRNIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRNIX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

VRNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than AMFEX's 10.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
10.48%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.03%0.82%1.21%1.41%1.59%2.86%1.46%1.65%2.00%1.73%1.93%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRNIX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRNIX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to AMFEX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRNIX dropped -34.57% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRNIX and AMFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer