VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VRIF.TO (Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRIF.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Vanguard, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. VRIF.TO is actively managed, while ZEB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRIF.TO returned 4.60%/yr vs 19.53%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VRIF.TO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.

Performance

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRIF.TO achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 25.33% return.

VRIF.TO

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 12.45%
• 3Y*: 9.77%
• 5Y*: 4.60%
• 10Y*: —

ZEB.TO

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: 25.33%
• 6M: 26.07%
• 1Y: 68.62%
• 3Y*: 34.82%
• 5Y*: 19.53%
• 10Y*: 16.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VRIF.TO Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio	4.98%	10.60%	8.42%	8.96%	-11.50%	7.44%	5.09%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	25.33%	43.43%	24.58%	10.87%	-10.38%	39.38%	12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020	0.52

The correlation between VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRIF.TO

VRIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
VRIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VRIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VRIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VRIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VRIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ZEB.TO

ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRIF.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	5.33	-3.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	7.18	-4.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.99	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	8.09	-5.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	34.80	-24.09

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRIF.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-39.69%	+23.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.57%	-8.44%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.01%	-14.80%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.19%	-25.97%	+9.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-5.65%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.96%	-0.85%

Volatility

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO) is 2.42%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that VRIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRIF.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	4.52%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.82%	11.13%	-6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.59%	12.81%	-7.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.26%	13.55%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.27%	16.90%	-10.63%

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRIF.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRIF.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

VRIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VRIF.TO Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio	3.73%	3.77%	3.94%	4.32%	4.72%	3.86%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.41%	2.95%	3.98%	4.75%	4.29%	3.13%	4.15%	3.65%	3.64%	3.02%	3.19%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO in my portfolio?

VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VRIF.TO or ZEB.TO?

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VRIF.TO or ZEB.TO?

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VRIF.TO.

What is the main difference between VRIF.TO and ZEB.TO?

VRIF.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VRIF.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.