PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRGWX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRGWX achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, VRGWX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 18.55%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.28% annualized return.


VRGWX

1D
0.50%
1M
2.01%
6M
4.17%
YTD
5.06%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
18.55%

VRTGX

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.30%
6M
11.87%
YTD
19.32%
1Y
34.13%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.06%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
19.32%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VRGWX and VRTGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.81

The correlation between VRGWX and VRTGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRGWX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRGWXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.18

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

7.78

-4.58

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRGWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRGWX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRGWX drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, smaller than the maximum VRTGX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRGWX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRGWXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-41.97%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-14.80%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-28.54%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-40.48%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-41.97%

+9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-2.39%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-10.38%

+5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.14%

+0.95%

Volatility

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRGWXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

6.34%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

16.74%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

22.21%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

24.71%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

24.52%

-3.31%

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRGWX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRGWX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

VRGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VRTGX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.46%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRGWX and VRTGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRGWX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VRTGX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRGWX dropped -32.70% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRGWX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer