VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO
VRE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF) and ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE CA All Cap RE Capped 25% Idx, while ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VRE.TO returned 4.52%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for ZAG.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRE.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZAG.TO.
Performance
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRE.TO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VRE.TO has outperformed ZAG.TO with an annualized return of 4.52%, while ZAG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
VRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRE.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF | 1.12% | 3.98% | 7.36% | 9.25% | -22.67% | 35.57% | -12.27% | 21.14% | 1.86% | 10.10% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.84% | 1.12% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRE.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, VRE.TO and ZAG.TO have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
Financial Services
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Basic Materials
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Energy
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Industrials
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Technology
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Communication Services
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Utilities
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Healthcare
VRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VRE.TO
ZAG.TO
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (VRE.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.12 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 1.06 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 2.48 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.67 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.12 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.24 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.45 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.06%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRE.TO and ZAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.06% | -18.03% | -30.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -2.79% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -5.42% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.87% | -15.77% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.06% | -18.03% | -30.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -1.09% | -7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -3.54% | -4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 1.19% | +5.85% |
Volatility
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (VRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that VRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 1.68% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 3.43% | +6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.02% | 4.45% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 6.58% | +9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 7.11% | +10.40% |
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRE.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
VRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than ZAG.TO's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRE.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF | 2.81% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.64% | 4.73% | 2.73% | 3.72% | 5.15% | 3.82% | 3.72% | 4.10% | 2.01% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRE.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRE.TO.
VRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. VRE.TO tracks FTSE CA All Cap RE Capped 25% Idx, while ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRE.TO and 0.09% for ZAG.TO.
Find the right allocation for VRE.TO and ZAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer