PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vranken-Pommery Monopole Société Anonyme (VRAP.PA) and Lanson-BCC (ALLAN.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VRAP.PA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALLAN.PA

1D
1.84%
1M
2.21%
YTD
-11.52%
6M
-13.94%
1Y
-26.46%
3Y*
-12.81%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
0.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRAP.PA
Vranken-Pommery Monopole Société Anonyme
0.00%-8.25%-13.25%-0.53%-2.18%22.45%-26.13%-12.98%4.01%8.51%
ALLAN.PA
Lanson-BCC
-11.52%-6.26%-12.48%32.24%14.70%33.79%-18.03%-9.86%-7.93%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VRAP.PA and ALLAN.PA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 1998

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lanson-BCC

Often compared with VRAP.PA:
VRAP.PA vs. LPE.PA

Return for Risk

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRAP.PA

ALLAN.PA
ALLAN.PA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ALLAN.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLAN.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLAN.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLAN.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLAN.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vranken-Pommery Monopole Société Anonyme (VRAP.PA) and Lanson-BCC (ALLAN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRAP.PAALLAN.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

Drawdowns

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRAP.PAALLAN.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.12%

Volatility

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRAP.PAALLAN.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.01%

Dividends

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Dividend Comparison

VRAP.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than ALLAN.PA's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALLAN.PA
Lanson-BCC
2.17%2.81%3.14%2.44%2.20%0.70%1.17%1.89%1.68%1.07%1.04%1.13%
VRAP.PA
Vranken-Pommery Monopole Société Anonyme
7.05%7.05%6.08%5.00%4.76%0.00%0.00%4.02%3.38%3.39%3.56%3.57%

Financials

VRAP.PA vs. ALLAN.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vranken-Pommery Monopole Société Anonyme and Lanson-BCC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VRAP.PA and ALLAN.PA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRAP.PA and ALLAN.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer