PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPNG.L achieves a 35.66% return, which is significantly higher than ERNS.L's 1.98% return.


VPNG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.71%
6M
23.38%
YTD
35.66%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
27.01%
5Y*
10Y*

ERNS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.99%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VPNG.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
35.66%20.65%15.20%11.28%-22.01%1.90%
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.98%4.84%5.55%4.76%1.53%-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VPNG.L and ERNS.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPNG.LERNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.40

-1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

19.43

-15.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

108.42

-97.74

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPNG.L and ERNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPNG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, which is greater than ERNS.L's maximum drawdown of -1.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPNG.L and ERNS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNG.LERNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-1.51%

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-0.22%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-0.22%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.37%

-0.03%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-0.05%

-11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

0.04%

+4.86%

Volatility

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) at 0.19%. This indicates that VPNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNG.LERNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

0.19%

+7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

0.65%

+15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.06%

0.79%

+23.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

0.82%

+20.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

0.92%

+20.09%

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPNG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNS.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPNG.L vs. ERNS.L - Dividend Comparison

VPNG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
4.28%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
VPNG.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPNG.L and ERNS.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPNG.L.

VPNG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ERNS.L is Ultrashort Bond. VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index, while ERNS.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPNG.L and 0.09% for ERNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPNG.L and ERNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer