PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPNG.L achieves a 50.78% return, which is significantly higher than BKCG.L's 35.75% return.


VPNG.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
10.12%
YTD
50.78%
6M
51.37%
1Y
81.99%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
10Y*

BKCG.L

1D
-3.52%
1M
10.26%
YTD
35.75%
6M
10.16%
1Y
105.28%
3Y*
56.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VPNG.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
50.78%20.65%15.20%11.28%-10.18%
BKCG.L
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
35.75%23.16%6.98%308.24%-77.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VPNG.L and BKCG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.46

The correlation between VPNG.L and BKCG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BKCG.L
BKCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BKCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPNG.LBKCG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.25

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

1.94

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

3.51

+16.16

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is higher than the BKCG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPNG.L and BKCG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPNG.LBKCG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66

1.56

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.16

+0.55

Drawdowns

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPNG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, smaller than the maximum BKCG.L drawdown of -82.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPNG.L and BKCG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNG.LBKCG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-82.56%

+55.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-54.08%

+39.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-57.72%

+30.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-25.72%

+23.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-43.37%

+31.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

29.84%

-25.69%

Volatility

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) is 6.89%, while Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that VPNG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNG.LBKCG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

19.30%

-12.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

45.66%

-29.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

67.15%

-44.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

74.54%

-53.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

74.54%

-53.81%

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VPNG.L and BKCG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

VPNG.L vs. BKCG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VPNG.L nor BKCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VPNG.L and BKCG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPNG.L and BKCG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index, while BKCG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPNG.L and BKCG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer