VPN vs. TSXU
VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - VPN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
VPN vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 52.56% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
VPN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPN vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 2.00% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPN and TSXU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPN vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
VPN
TSXU
VPN vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 4.53 | -3.77 |
Drawdowns
VPN vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -35.62% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.92% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -10.56% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility
VPN vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 78.68% | -56.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 78.68% | -56.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 78.68% | -56.78% |
VPN vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPN vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPN and TSXU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VPN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VPN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.72% for VPN.
VPN is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for VPN and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer