PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPLS vs. SPMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPLS vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPLS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 15.96% return.


VPLS

1D
0.09%
1M
1.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.33%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPMD

1D
0.39%
1M
5.72%
YTD
15.96%
6M
14.71%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPLS vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.99%7.86%2.72%2.83%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
15.96%7.44%13.91%6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VPLS and SPMD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPLS vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMD
SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPLS vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPLSSPMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.23

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

11.84

-5.16

VPLS vs. SPMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SPMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPLS and SPMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPLS vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPLS and SPMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPLSSPMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-57.62%

+53.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-8.86%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-8.11%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

2.41%

-1.55%

Volatility

VPLS vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) is 1.28%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that VPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPLSSPMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

5.07%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

11.74%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

15.86%

-12.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.60%

19.75%

-15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

21.20%

-16.60%

VPLS vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPLS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPLS vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison

VPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than SPMD's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
1.21%1.39%1.42%1.47%1.64%1.24%1.30%1.57%1.85%1.97%2.13%5.33%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.74%4.78%4.52%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPLS and SPMD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMD has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to VPLS (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPLS dropped -4.17% vs SPMD's -57.62%.

On 1-year performance, SPMD leads with 28.46% vs 5.74% for VPLS. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 28.46% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.21% for SPMD.

VPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VPLS and 0.05% for SPMD.

SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPLS and SPMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer