PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPLS vs. CPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPLS vs. CPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPLS achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than CPLS's 0.36% return.


VPLS

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPLS

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.14%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPLS vs. CPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.64%7.86%2.72%1.46%
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
0.36%6.91%1.65%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VPLS and CPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.96

The correlation between VPLS and CPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPLS vs. CPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CPLS
CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPLS vs. CPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPLSCPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.11

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

6.61

+0.50

VPLS vs. CPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the CPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPLS and CPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPLSCPLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.35

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.85

+0.38

Drawdowns

VPLS vs. CPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum CPLS drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPLS and CPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPLSCPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-4.43%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.47%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.20%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-1.24%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.79%

+0.04%

Volatility

VPLS vs. CPLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) is 1.27%, while AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that VPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPLSCPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.38%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.86%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

3.87%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.61%

4.82%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.61%

4.82%

-0.21%

VPLS vs. CPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPLS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CPLS's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPLS vs. CPLS - Dividend Comparison

VPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than CPLS's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
4.62%4.66%4.71%0.23%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.76%4.78%4.52%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VPLS and CPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CPLS has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to VPLS (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPLS dropped -4.17% vs CPLS's -4.43%.

On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.91% vs 5.19% for CPLS. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CPLS.

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.62% for CPLS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VPLS and 0.33% for CPLS.

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPLS and CPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer