VPLS vs. BNDI
VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) and BNDI (Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VPLS returned 5.91% vs 7.00% for BNDI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VPLS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BNDI.
Performance
VPLS vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPLS achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than BNDI's 1.29% return.
VPLS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPLS vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 0.64% | 7.86% | 2.72% | 2.82% |
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 7.95% | 1.74% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPLS and BNDI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VPLS and BNDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VPLS vs. BNDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPLS
BNDI
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VPLS
BNDI
Technology
VPLS
BNDI
Energy
VPLS
BNDI
Real Estate
VPLS
BNDI
Basic Materials
VPLS
-
BNDI
Communication Services
VPLS
-
BNDI
Consumer Cyclical
VPLS
-
BNDI
Consumer Defensive
VPLS
-
BNDI
Healthcare
VPLS
-
BNDI
Industrials
VPLS
-
BNDI
Utilities
VPLS
-
BNDI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPLS vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank
VPLS
BNDI
VPLS vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPLS | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.56 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 9.12 | -2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPLS | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.69 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.65 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
VPLS vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum BNDI drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPLS and BNDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPLS | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -6.98% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -2.75% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.84% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -1.71% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.77% | +0.06% |
Volatility
VPLS vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) is 1.27%, while Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that VPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPLS | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.38% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 3.08% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 4.17% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 6.19% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 6.19% | -1.58% |
VPLS vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPLS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPLS vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison
VPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than BNDI's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 5.80% | 5.69% | 5.54% | 5.17% | 1.68% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VPLS and BNDI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BNDI has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to VPLS (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPLS dropped -4.17% vs BNDI's -6.98%.
On 1-year performance, BNDI leads with 7.00% vs 5.91% for VPLS. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNDI has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BNDI.
BNDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 4.76% for VPLS.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VPLS and 0.58% for BNDI.
BNDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPLS and BNDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer