VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE
VOOL.DE (Amundi S&P 500 VIX Futures Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF Acc) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOL.DE is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Futures Roll Enhanced TR, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOL.DE returned -26.18%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. VOOL.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOL.DE achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOL.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of -26.18%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
VOOL.DE
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- -17.45%
- 3Y*
- -28.39%
- 5Y*
- -26.95%
- 10Y*
- -26.18%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOL.DE Amundi S&P 500 VIX Futures Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF Acc | 2.95% | -25.96% | -26.51% | -52.19% | -7.88% | -38.71% | 42.44% | -35.38% | 30.69% | -63.80% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOL.DE and LSMC.DE is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2012 | -0.44 |
The correlation between VOOL.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.44 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VOOL.DE
LSMC.DE
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 VIX Futures Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF Acc (VOOL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOL.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.59 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 10.37 | -11.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 32.83 | -33.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOL.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 4.27 | -4.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 | 1.15 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | 1.09 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.82 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOL.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.72%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOL.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOL.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.72% | -39.77% | -58.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.83% | -12.53% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.28% | -36.22% | -28.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.72% | -39.77% | -42.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.48% | -39.77% | -56.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.63% | -3.34% | -95.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -9.37% | -73.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.81% | 3.96% | +11.85% |
Volatility
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 VIX Futures Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF Acc (VOOL.DE) is 3.79%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that VOOL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOL.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 11.23% | -7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 22.18% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.21% | 30.40% | -3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 31.21% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.00% | 26.06% | +17.94% |
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOL.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VOOL.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOL.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VOOL.DE.
VOOL.DE is categorized as Volatility, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. VOOL.DE tracks S&P 500 VIX Futures Roll Enhanced TR, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VOOL.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for VOOL.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer