PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOLT vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOLT vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than UFO's 20.70% return.


VOLT

1D
-0.65%
1M
-3.18%
6M
17.09%
YTD
32.65%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.57%

UFO

1D
-2.06%
1M
-7.39%
6M
7.29%
YTD
20.70%
1Y
54.34%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.42M$26.49M$69.76M
$13.39M$12.05M$15.46M

VOLT vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
32.65%25.92%-8.98%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
20.70%67.36%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and UFO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.52

The correlation between VOLT and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOLT vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOLT
UFO

Industrials

50.4%
48.9%

Utilities

28.2%

-

Technology

14.1%
20.8%

Energy

4.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Financial Services

0.5%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

28.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

VOLT
50.4%
UFO
48.9%

Utilities

VOLT
28.2%
UFO

-

Technology

VOLT
14.1%
UFO
20.8%

Energy

VOLT
4.7%
UFO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOLT
2.6%
UFO

-

Basic Materials

VOLT
1.4%
UFO

-

Financial Services

VOLT
0.5%
UFO
0.0%

Communication Services

VOLT

-

UFO
28.8%

Consumer Defensive

VOLT

-

UFO

-

Healthcare

VOLT

-

UFO

-

Real Estate

VOLT

-

UFO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOLT vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOLT vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOLTUFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.49

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

3.91

+5.08

VOLT vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOLTUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-50.33%

+26.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-36.71%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-31.20%

+22.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-21.98%

+16.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

13.95%

-9.34%

Volatility

VOLT vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Procure Space ETF (UFO) have volatilities of 9.55% and 9.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOLTUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

9.83%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.18%

33.03%

-11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

42.13%

-17.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.47%

31.03%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

31.30%

-5.83%

VOLT vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOLT and UFO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

VOLT vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than UFO's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.32%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.34%0.46%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOLT and UFO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFO has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to VOLT (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs UFO's -50.33%.

On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 54.34% vs 41.33% for VOLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 54.34% return vs 41.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOLT and UFO have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.32% for UFO.

They also come from different issuers: Tema and Procure.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOLT and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer