PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOLT vs. NIKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VOLT vs. NIKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VOLT vs. NIKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
20.35%25.92%-8.86%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
4.61%52.05%-8.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than NIKL's 4.61% return.


VOLT

1D
1.66%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
20.35%
6M
20.49%
1Y
62.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NIKL

1D
2.78%
1M
-15.83%
YTD
4.61%
6M
12.89%
1Y
90.01%
3Y*
-1.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VOLT vs. NIKL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOLT and NIKL have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

VOLT vs. NIKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. NIKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOLTNIKLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

2.19

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.60

2.72

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.40

3.03

+3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.96

9.50

+10.46

VOLT vs. NIKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the NIKL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and NIKL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOLTNIKLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.19

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.01

+1.16

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and NIKL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VOLT vs. NIKL - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than NIKL's 2.42% yield.


TTM202520242023
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.38%0.46%0.01%0.00%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.42%2.53%3.49%19.52%

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. NIKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum NIKL drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and NIKL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VOLTNIKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-60.23%

+36.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-29.33%

+19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-20.08%

+16.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-27.00%

+21.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

9.35%

-6.14%

Volatility

VOLT vs. NIKL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) is 9.05%, while Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a volatility of 16.87%. This indicates that VOLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VOLTNIKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

16.87%

-7.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

33.15%

-17.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.48%

41.35%

-19.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

31.74%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

31.74%

-7.89%