PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNRG.L is traded in GBP, while MXUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VNRG.L having a 10.37% return and MXUD.L slightly higher at 10.85%.


VNRG.L

1D
0.11%
1M
4.70%
YTD
10.37%
6M
9.73%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*

MXUD.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.65%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.32%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VNRG.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.37%10.01%26.94%19.89%-9.87%28.98%15.46%1.23%
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
10.81%9.07%27.65%21.47%-10.39%28.01%15.33%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRG.L and MXUD.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.93

The correlation between VNRG.L and MXUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRG.L
MXUD.L

Technology

34.4%
35.4%

Financial Services

13.0%
11.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Industrials

8.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

VNRG.L
34.4%
MXUD.L
35.4%

Financial Services

VNRG.L
13.0%
MXUD.L
11.6%

Communication Services

VNRG.L
10.9%
MXUD.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRG.L
9.8%
MXUD.L
10.1%

Industrials

VNRG.L
8.3%
MXUD.L
8.6%

Healthcare

VNRG.L
8.2%
MXUD.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VNRG.L
4.7%
MXUD.L
4.8%

Energy

VNRG.L
4.3%
MXUD.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

VNRG.L
2.4%
MXUD.L
1.8%

Utilities

VNRG.L
2.3%
MXUD.L
2.3%

Real Estate

VNRG.L
1.8%
MXUD.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRG.L
VNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MXUD.L
MXUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNRG.LMXUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.82

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

12.47

+2.23

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRG.L and MXUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNRG.LMXUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.41

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.95

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.86

+0.04

Drawdowns

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, roughly equal to the maximum MXUD.L drawdown of -26.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRG.L and MXUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRG.LMXUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-26.88%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.54%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-21.48%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-21.48%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.08%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-3.96%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.32%

-0.37%

Volatility

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) is 2.56%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that VNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRG.LMXUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.55%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

8.62%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

11.93%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

15.67%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

17.70%

-1.44%

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRG.L vs. MXUD.L - Dividend Comparison

VNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
1.05%1.14%1.30%1.47%1.66%0.62%
VNRG.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VNRG.L and MXUD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRG.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRG.L and 0.05% for MXUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRG.L and MXUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer