VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L
VNRG.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VNRG.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while LGUS.L tracks the Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNRG.L returned 13.00%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for LGUS.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VNRG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUS.L.
Performance
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VNRG.L is traded in GBP, while LGUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VNRG.L having a 8.99% return and LGUS.L slightly higher at 9.16%.
VNRG.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
LGUS.L
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- —
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 8.99% | 10.01% | 27.28% | 19.88% | -9.85% | 28.98% | 15.46% | 1.78% |
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.16% | 9.57% | 27.28% | 22.23% | -11.00% | 29.12% | 17.60% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRG.L and LGUS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VNRG.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNRG.L
LGUS.L
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNRG.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.52 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | 7.91 | +1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRG.L and LGUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRG.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -26.39% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -7.68% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -21.47% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.91% | -21.47% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -1.89% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.79% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.46% | -0.45% |
Volatility
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) is 2.90%, while L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that VNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRG.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.33% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.72% | 9.59% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 12.85% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 16.03% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 17.60% | -1.48% |
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRG.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VNRG.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VNRG.L and LGUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRG.L.
VNRG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRG.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.
Find the right allocation for VNRG.L and LGUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer