PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRG.L vs. ESES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNRG.L is traded in GBP, while ESES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRG.L achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than ESES.L's 21.44% return.


VNRG.L

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.42%
6M
9.53%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.06%

ESES.L

1D
1.14%
1M
-8.02%
6M
15.00%
YTD
21.44%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
151.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNRG.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
9.32%10.01%27.28%19.88%-9.85%11.94%
ESES.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
21.44%24.05%7.54%2.94%-11.14%6,848.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRG.L and ESES.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021

0.53

The correlation between VNRG.L and ESES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRG.L
ESES.L

Technology

37.8%
29.5%

Financial Services

12.3%
32.0%

Communication Services

10.4%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
3.2%

Industrials

7.8%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
2.9%

Energy

3.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
5.4%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Technology

VNRG.L
37.8%
ESES.L
29.5%

Financial Services

VNRG.L
12.3%
ESES.L
32.0%

Communication Services

VNRG.L
10.4%
ESES.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRG.L
9.6%
ESES.L
9.4%

Healthcare

VNRG.L
8.0%
ESES.L
3.2%

Industrials

VNRG.L
7.8%
ESES.L
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

VNRG.L
4.3%
ESES.L
2.9%

Energy

VNRG.L
3.9%
ESES.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

VNRG.L
2.3%
ESES.L
5.4%

Utilities

VNRG.L
2.1%
ESES.L
1.2%

Real Estate

VNRG.L
1.6%
ESES.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRG.L
VNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ESES.L
ESES.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ESES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ESES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNRG.LESES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.38

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

10.21

-0.23

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the ESES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRG.L and ESES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, which is greater than ESES.L's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRG.L and ESES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRG.LESES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-23.59%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-10.79%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-23.59%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.91%

-23.59%

+2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-9.02%

+7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-10.51%

+6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.58%

-1.57%

Volatility

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) is 2.91%, while Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that VNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRG.LESES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

7.36%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

17.08%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

19.15%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

21.67%

-7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

3,194.14%

-3,178.02%

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ESES.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRG.L vs. ESES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VNRG.L nor ESES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNRG.L and ESES.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNRG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESES.L.

VNRG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ESES.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VNRG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ESES.L tracks MSCI EM Universal Select Business Screens Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRG.L and 0.19% for ESES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRG.L and ESES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer