PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRA.DE achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than EDMU.DE's 10.40% return.


VNRA.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.57%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.70%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*

EDMU.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.40%
6M
9.74%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
11.15%5.41%32.23%22.65%-15.14%38.59%9.69%8.03%
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.40%2.64%31.12%22.05%-17.35%38.97%10.90%8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019

0.99

The correlation between VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRA.DE
VNRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EDMU.DE
EDMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNRA.DEEDMU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.85

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

9.88

+2.67

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNRA.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.95

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.82

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.83

+0.04

Drawdowns

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.48%, roughly equal to the maximum EDMU.DE drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRA.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.48%

-33.43%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-8.15%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-24.12%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-24.12%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.41%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-5.36%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.36%

-0.35%

Volatility

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRA.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.69%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

7.80%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

11.93%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

15.55%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.39%

+0.01%

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EDMU.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRA.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VNRA.DE nor EDMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRA.DE.

VNRA.DE tracks FTSE North America, while EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRA.DE and 0.07% for EDMU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRA.DE and EDMU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer