PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQI vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQI vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 2.74%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


VNQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.85%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
2.74%

IWS

1D
1.16%
1M
4.03%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-0.33%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.45%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and IWS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010

0.69

The correlation between VNQI and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQI vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQI
IWS

Real Estate

91.2%
8.2%

Financial Services

1.9%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
8.4%

Industrials

0.7%
16.5%

Energy

0.3%
7.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%
5.4%

Technology

0.2%
18.2%

Utilities

0.1%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
4.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Real Estate

VNQI
91.2%
IWS
8.2%

Financial Services

VNQI
1.9%
IWS
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQI
1.1%
IWS
8.4%

Industrials

VNQI
0.7%
IWS
16.5%

Energy

VNQI
0.3%
IWS
7.7%

Basic Materials

VNQI
0.3%
IWS
5.4%

Technology

VNQI
0.2%
IWS
18.2%

Utilities

VNQI
0.1%
IWS
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

VNQI
0.1%
IWS
4.8%

Healthcare

VNQI
0.0%
IWS
7.5%

Communication Services

VNQI

-

IWS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQI vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNQIIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

3.68

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

13.82

-12.69

VNQI vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQIIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-62.40%

+24.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-7.53%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-20.57%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-21.23%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

-43.83%

+5.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

0.00%

-9.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-8.01%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

2.00%

+3.19%

Volatility

VNQI vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 4.29%. This indicates that VNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQIIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.29%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

9.97%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

13.53%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

17.36%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

19.37%

-3.30%

VNQI vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQI vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.72%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQI and IWS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQI has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 2.74% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.23% for IWS.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQI and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer