VNQI vs. AMID

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) and AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent. VNQI is passively managed, while AMID is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VNQI returned 8.59%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for AMID. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for AMID.

Performance

VNQI vs. AMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMID's 7.01% return.

VNQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

AMID

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	-0.33%	21.38%	-2.22%	6.99%	-9.54%
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	7.01%	-1.39%	13.06%	31.26%	-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and AMID is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022	0.56

The correlation between VNQI and AMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQI vs. AMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNQI	AMID
Real Estate	91.2%	3.3%
Financial Services	1.9%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	11.4%
Industrials	0.7%	32.1%
Energy	0.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	0.3%	3.4%
Technology	0.2%	18.1%
Utilities	0.1%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	2.6%
Healthcare	0.0%	7.2%
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

VNQI vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI

VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 16
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNQI	AMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.60	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	0.97	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.11	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	0.80	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	2.78	-1.65

VNQI vs. AMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the AMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and AMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than AMID's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and AMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNQI	AMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.35%	-23.32%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-12.31%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.35%	-23.32%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.99%	-3.91%	-6.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-6.19%	-4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	3.56%	+1.63%

Volatility

VNQI vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) is 4.62%, while Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that VNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNQI	AMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	5.84%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	12.80%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	16.59%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.54%	19.17%	-3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	19.17%	-3.10%

VNQI vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNQI vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than AMID's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.72%	4.70%	5.16%	3.74%	0.57%	6.48%	0.93%	7.58%	4.62%	3.86%	5.18%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNQI and AMID in my portfolio?

VNQI and AMID have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNQI or AMID?

AMID has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs AMID's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, VNQI or AMID?

On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 11.79% vs 8.59% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNQI or AMID?

Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNQI or AMID?

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNQI or AMID?

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.

What is the main difference between VNQI and AMID?

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while AMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.52% for AMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.