PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNM vs. THD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNM vs. THD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than THD's 24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed THD with an annualized return of 3.30%, while THD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.


VNM

1D
-0.61%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
-3.39%
1Y
29.35%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
3.30%

THD

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.17%
6M
25.06%
1Y
42.49%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNM vs. THD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-5.56%66.55%-11.15%15.01%-43.74%22.05%9.84%9.24%-16.83%38.80%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
24.17%2.36%-2.21%-12.63%1.22%1.87%-9.89%8.32%-8.25%31.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VNM and THD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2009

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between VNM and THD has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VNM vs. THD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNM
THD

Real Estate

31.4%
5.1%

Financial Services

27.5%
11.2%

Industrials

14.9%
29.3%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%
7.8%

Basic Materials

7.9%
3.5%

Technology

1.7%
0.9%

Energy

1.2%
14.3%

Utilities

1.0%
6.7%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Healthcare

-

6.4%

Real Estate

VNM
31.4%
THD
5.1%

Financial Services

VNM
27.5%
THD
11.2%

Industrials

VNM
14.9%
THD
29.3%

Consumer Defensive

VNM
14.4%
THD
7.8%

Basic Materials

VNM
7.9%
THD
3.5%

Technology

VNM
1.7%
THD
0.9%

Energy

VNM
1.2%
THD
14.3%

Utilities

VNM
1.0%
THD
6.7%

Communication Services

VNM

-

THD
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VNM

-

THD
4.6%

Healthcare

VNM

-

THD
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNM vs. THD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

THD
THD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNM vs. THD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNMTHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.25

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

9.35

-4.96

VNM vs. THD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the THD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNM and THD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNMTHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.88

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.04

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.16

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.18

-0.20

Drawdowns

VNM vs. THD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, roughly equal to the maximum THD drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and THD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNMTHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-64.22%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-13.12%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.60%

-34.11%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

-40.24%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

-49.32%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.45%

-8.82%

-17.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.83%

-18.28%

-19.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.72%

4.58%

+2.14%

Volatility

VNM vs. THD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 5.52%, while iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNMTHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

6.41%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

18.28%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.79%

22.67%

+4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.26%

19.79%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

21.58%

+1.88%

VNM vs. THD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than THD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNM vs. THD - Dividend Comparison

VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than THD's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
2.71%3.36%3.15%2.92%2.41%3.16%2.31%2.42%2.57%2.16%2.61%3.58%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.21%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNM and THD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to VNM (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNM dropped -63.19% vs THD's -64.22%.

On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 3.30% for VNM. On fees, THD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, VNM has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.

THD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.21% for VNM.

VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index, while THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.59% for THD.

THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNM and THD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer