VNM vs. FPA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA).

VNM and FPA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VNM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Vietnam Index. It was launched on Aug 11, 2009. FPA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. Both VNM and FPA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VNM vs. FPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VNM vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF	-9.28%	66.55%	-11.15%	15.01%	-43.74%	22.05%	9.84%	9.24%	-16.83%	38.80%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	17.42%	43.16%	3.95%	9.97%	-14.55%	2.98%	13.43%	8.91%	-21.91%	35.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than FPA's 17.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed FPA with an annualized return of 3.56%, while FPA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.

VNM

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -9.28%
• YTD: -9.28%
• 6M: -2.77%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 3.56%

FPA

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: -12.20%
• YTD: 17.42%
• 6M: 20.56%
• 1Y: 61.12%
• 3Y*: 21.98%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNM vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.

FPA

First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund

VNM

VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF

Return for Risk

VNM vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNM

VNM Risk / Return Rank: 70
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FPA

FPA Risk / Return Rank: 95
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNM vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VNM	FPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.40	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	3.14	-1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	3.96	-1.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	16.04	-10.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VNM vs. FPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FPA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNM and FPA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VNM	FPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.40	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.41	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.37	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.26	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between VNM and FPA is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VNM vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison

VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FPA's 4.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF	0.22%	0.20%	0.00%	5.21%	0.96%	0.49%	0.40%	0.76%	0.83%	1.14%	2.44%	3.69%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	4.54%	4.71%	3.40%	3.02%	4.22%	5.12%	1.59%	3.90%	2.81%	3.15%	2.42%	1.74%

Drawdowns

VNM vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than FPA's maximum drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and FPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNM	FPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.19%	-52.91%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.24%	-15.37%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.95%	-35.36%	-14.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.67%	-52.91%	+1.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.34%	-12.52%	-16.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.99%	-13.60%	-24.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.75%	3.80%	+2.95%

Volatility

VNM vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 9.41%, while First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNM	FPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.41%	12.28%	-2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.06%	17.57%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	25.56%	+7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.07%	23.12%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.38%	21.91%	+1.47%