PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNM vs. EWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNM vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly lower than EWZ's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed EWZ with an annualized return of 3.29%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.29% annualized return.


VNM

1D
-1.27%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
-6.66%
6M
2.04%
1Y
37.07%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
3.29%

EWZ

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
10.48%
6M
9.03%
1Y
31.51%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNM vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
-6.66%66.55%-11.15%15.01%-43.74%22.05%9.84%9.24%-16.83%38.80%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
10.48%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VNM and EWZ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2009

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between VNM and EWZ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VNM vs. EWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNM
EWZ

Real Estate

31.4%

-

Financial Services

27.5%
32.7%

Industrials

14.9%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

7.9%
13.7%

Technology

1.7%
1.0%

Energy

1.2%
18.5%

Utilities

1.0%
12.9%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

2.4%

Real Estate

VNM
31.4%
EWZ

-

Financial Services

VNM
27.5%
EWZ
32.7%

Industrials

VNM
14.9%
EWZ
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

VNM
14.4%
EWZ
4.2%

Basic Materials

VNM
7.9%
EWZ
13.7%

Technology

VNM
1.7%
EWZ
1.0%

Energy

VNM
1.2%
EWZ
18.5%

Utilities

VNM
1.0%
EWZ
12.9%

Communication Services

VNM

-

EWZ
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VNM

-

EWZ
1.5%

Healthcare

VNM

-

EWZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNM vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNM vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNMEWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.64

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

5.17

-0.24

VNM vs. EWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the EWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNM and EWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNM vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum EWZ drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and EWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNMEWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-77.25%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-19.27%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.60%

-31.36%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

-32.24%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

-56.99%

+5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.30%

-23.06%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.81%

-35.93%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

6.10%

+0.73%

Volatility

VNM vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 4.95%, while iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNMEWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

7.35%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

19.97%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.72%

25.20%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.27%

27.70%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

34.04%

-10.58%

VNM vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNM vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison

VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than EWZ's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.70%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.21%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNM and EWZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZ has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to VNM (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNM dropped -63.19% vs EWZ's -77.25%.

On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 8.29% vs 3.29% for VNM. On fees, EWZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, VNM has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.21% for VNM.

VNM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EWZ is Latin America Equities. VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index, while EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.59% for EWZ.

VNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNM and EWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer