VNM vs. EWZ
VNM (VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF) and EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Vietnam Index, while EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNM returned 3.29%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for EWZ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWZ.
Performance
VNM vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly lower than EWZ's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed EWZ with an annualized return of 3.29%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.29% annualized return.
VNM
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- YTD
- -6.66%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
EWZ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
VNM vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | -6.66% | 66.55% | -11.15% | 15.01% | -43.74% | 22.05% | 9.84% | 9.24% | -16.83% | 38.80% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 10.48% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNM and EWZ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2009 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VNM and EWZ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VNM vs. EWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNM
EWZ
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
VNM
EWZ
-
Financial Services
VNM
EWZ
Industrials
VNM
EWZ
Consumer Defensive
VNM
EWZ
Basic Materials
VNM
EWZ
Technology
VNM
EWZ
Energy
VNM
EWZ
Utilities
VNM
EWZ
Communication Services
VNM
-
EWZ
Consumer Cyclical
VNM
-
EWZ
Healthcare
VNM
-
EWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNM vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank
VNM
EWZ
VNM vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNM | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.64 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 5.17 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNM vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum EWZ drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and EWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNM | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -77.25% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.07% | -19.27% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.60% | -31.36% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.95% | -32.24% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.67% | -56.99% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.30% | -23.06% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -35.93% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 6.10% | +0.73% |
Volatility
VNM vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 4.95%, while iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNM | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 7.35% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 19.97% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.72% | 25.20% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 27.70% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 34.04% | -10.58% |
VNM vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNM vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison
VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than EWZ's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.70% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
VNM VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 5.21% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.40% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 1.14% | 2.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNM and EWZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWZ has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to VNM (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNM dropped -63.19% vs EWZ's -77.25%.
On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 8.29% vs 3.29% for VNM. On fees, EWZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, VNM has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.
EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.21% for VNM.
VNM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EWZ is Latin America Equities. VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index, while EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for VNM and 0.59% for EWZ.
VNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNM and EWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer