VNLA vs. FTSM
VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) and FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. VNLA is passively managed, while FTSM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNLA returned 3.80%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for FTSM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNLA charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for FTSM.
Performance
VNLA vs. FTSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VNLA at 1.47% and FTSM at 1.47%.
VNLA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FTSM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
VNLA vs. FTSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 1.47% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% | 3.01% | 4.43% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 1.47% | 4.66% | 5.22% | 5.12% | 1.02% | -0.01% | 1.12% | 2.82% | 1.94% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNLA and FTSM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2016 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, VNLA and FTSM have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNLA vs. FTSM — Risk / Return Rank
VNLA
FTSM
VNLA vs. FTSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNLA | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.62 | 4.42 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.20 | 35.88 | -24.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.58 | 178.84 | -121.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNLA | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.60 | 8.82 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.67 | 7.03 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 1.96 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
VNLA vs. FTSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, which is greater than FTSM's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and FTSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNLA | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -4.12% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.43% | -0.12% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.49% | -0.15% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.76% | -0.65% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.02% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -0.22% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.02% | +0.06% |
Volatility
VNLA vs. FTSM - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) has a higher volatility of 0.16% compared to First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) at 0.14%. This indicates that VNLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNLA | FTSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.14% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.46% | 0.35% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 0.49% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.42% | 0.88% | +0.54% |
VNLA vs. FTSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNLA vs. FTSM - Dividend Comparison
VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than FTSM's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.16% | 4.28% | 4.91% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.14% | 1.49% | 1.03% | 0.48% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.78% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNLA and FTSM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNLA has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to FTSM (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs FTSM's -4.12%.
On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.80% vs 3.46% for FTSM. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.80% return vs 3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FTSM.
VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.16% for FTSM.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.44% for FTSM.
FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.82 vs 7.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNLA and FTSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer