PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. FOXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNAM vs. FOXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Simplify Currency Strategy ETF (FOXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FOXY's 11.55% return.


VNAM

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
1.38%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
10Y*

FOXY

1D
0.27%
1M
1.51%
YTD
11.55%
6M
7.50%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNAM vs. FOXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-2.39%65.62%
FOXY
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF
11.55%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and FOXY is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

-0.06

VNAM vs. FOXY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNAM
FOXY

Real Estate

38.6%

-

Financial Services

25.5%
75.1%

Industrials

12.8%

-

Basic Materials

9.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Technology

4.7%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

VNAM
38.6%
FOXY

-

Financial Services

VNAM
25.5%
FOXY
75.1%

Industrials

VNAM
12.8%
FOXY

-

Basic Materials

VNAM
9.0%
FOXY

-

Consumer Defensive

VNAM
5.9%
FOXY

-

Technology

VNAM
4.7%
FOXY

-

Energy

VNAM
1.9%
FOXY

-

Consumer Cyclical

VNAM
0.9%
FOXY

-

Utilities

VNAM
0.7%
FOXY

-

Communication Services

VNAM

-

FOXY

-

Healthcare

VNAM

-

FOXY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. FOXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FOXY
FOXY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FOXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOXY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FOXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOXY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNAM vs. FOXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Simplify Currency Strategy ETF (FOXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNAMFOXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.86

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

13.60

-6.26

VNAM vs. FOXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FOXY Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and FOXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNAMFOXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.13

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

1.37

-1.39

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. FOXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than FOXY's maximum drawdown of -13.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and FOXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMFOXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-13.09%

-39.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-4.32%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-1.32%

-7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-2.11%

-28.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

1.54%

+4.27%

Volatility

VNAM vs. FOXY - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Simplify Currency Strategy ETF (FOXY) at 2.17%. This indicates that VNAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNAMFOXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

2.17%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

7.42%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

9.99%

+16.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

15.07%

+10.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

15.07%

+10.53%

VNAM vs. FOXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FOXY's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNAM vs. FOXY - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FOXY's 8.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FOXY
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF
8.14%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.51%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNAM and FOXY have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNAM has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FOXY (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNAM dropped -52.84% vs FOXY's -13.09%.

On 1-year performance, VNAM leads with 42.45% vs 20.91% for FOXY. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FOXY has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VNAM has performed better with a 42.45% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for FOXY.

FOXY has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

VNAM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FOXY is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for VNAM and 0.81% for FOXY.

FOXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNAM and FOXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer