PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VNAM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VNAM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-9.22%67.05%-7.78%12.95%-44.16%2.41%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
8.23%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%1.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -9.22% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 8.23% return.


VNAM

1D
2.95%
1M
-10.96%
YTD
-9.22%
6M
0.68%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10Y*

EMXC

1D
4.13%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
8.23%
6M
18.73%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VNAM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNAM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNAMEMXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

2.31

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

2.98

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.26

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

13.81

-6.25

VNAM vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and EMXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNAMEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.31

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.39

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and EMXC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VNAM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than EMXC's 2.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.55%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.60%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and EMXC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-42.81%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.11%

-14.41%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.29%

-10.88%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.58%

-10.35%

-21.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

3.40%

+2.47%

Volatility

VNAM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is 10.30%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that VNAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VNAMEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.30%

11.89%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.30%

16.14%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.59%

20.58%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

16.70%

+8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

19.51%

+6.01%