PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNAM vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.


VNAM

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
1.38%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
10Y*

AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNAM vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-2.39%67.05%-7.78%12.95%-44.16%2.41%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and AIQ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.28

The correlation between VNAM and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNAM vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNAM
AIQ

Real Estate

38.6%

-

Financial Services

25.5%
0.4%

Industrials

12.8%
4.2%

Basic Materials

9.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Technology

4.7%
73.3%

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
8.5%

Utilities

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

13.2%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Real Estate

VNAM
38.6%
AIQ

-

Financial Services

VNAM
25.5%
AIQ
0.4%

Industrials

VNAM
12.8%
AIQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

VNAM
9.0%
AIQ

-

Consumer Defensive

VNAM
5.9%
AIQ

-

Technology

VNAM
4.7%
AIQ
73.3%

Energy

VNAM
1.9%
AIQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

VNAM
0.9%
AIQ
8.5%

Utilities

VNAM
0.7%
AIQ

-

Communication Services

VNAM

-

AIQ
13.2%

Healthcare

VNAM

-

AIQ
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNAM vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNAMAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.22

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

14.59

-7.25

VNAM vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNAMAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

3.02

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.84

-0.86

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-44.66%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-16.47%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

-26.35%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-1.40%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-9.80%

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

4.76%

+1.05%

Volatility

VNAM vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is 6.74%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that VNAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNAMAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

8.60%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

18.46%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

23.04%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

25.33%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

25.50%

+0.10%

VNAM vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNAM vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.51%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNAM and AIQ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to VNAM (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNAM dropped -52.84% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 3-year performance, AIQ leads with 37.50% vs 16.20% for VNAM. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, VNAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 16.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

VNAM has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

VNAM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for VNAM and 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNAM and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer