VMVFX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMVFX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VMVFX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.02%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMVFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VMVFX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
VMVFX
CSUAX
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMVFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.63 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.17 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.36 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 10.32 | -5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMVFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.63 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.61 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.50 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.55 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMVFX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
VMVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMVFX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVFX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMVFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -52.20% | +19.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -7.98% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -20.45% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.09% | -35.05% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -4.38% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -8.49% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.83% | -0.20% |
Volatility
VMVFX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) is 2.61%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that VMVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMVFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 3.26% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 6.89% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 11.48% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 12.89% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 14.89% | -2.41% |