PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMPAX vs. SCVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (VMPAX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMPAX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCVAX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VMPAX has underperformed SCVAX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while SCVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.18% annualized return.


VMPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
2.34%

SCVAX

1D
1.50%
1M
2.72%
YTD
18.58%
6M
15.59%
1Y
28.85%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMPAX
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
1.31%3.54%5.44%6.56%-5.68%0.90%3.13%4.67%2.02%3.14%
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
18.58%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VMPAX and SCVAX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

-0.04

The correlation between VMPAX and SCVAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMPAX vs. SCVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMPAX
VMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (VMPAX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMPAXSCVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.29

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.51

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

10.82

-2.30

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the SCVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMPAX and SCVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMPAX drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum SCVAX drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMPAX and SCVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMPAXSCVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-70.30%

+61.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-8.21%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.16%

-26.83%

+23.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.62%

-26.83%

+18.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.62%

-46.64%

+38.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.07%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-10.59%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

2.66%

-2.10%

Volatility

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (VMPAX) is 0.48%, while Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that VMPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMPAXSCVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

4.87%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

11.85%

-10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72%

17.18%

-15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.49%

20.69%

-18.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

23.24%

-20.79%

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMPAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SCVAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMPAX vs. SCVAX - Dividend Comparison

VMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than SCVAX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
4.96%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
VMPAX
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
2.57%2.55%4.94%4.21%1.56%1.33%1.66%2.13%1.87%1.86%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMPAX and SCVAX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to VMPAX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMPAX dropped -8.62% vs SCVAX's -70.30%.

VMPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMPAX and SCVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer