VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO
VMO.TO (Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD) and ZCS.TO (BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMO.TO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while ZCS.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond Index. VMO.TO is actively managed, while ZCS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMO.TO returned 17.80%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for ZCS.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VMO.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for ZCS.TO.
Performance
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMO.TO achieves a 25.71% return, which is significantly higher than ZCS.TO's 1.29% return.
VMO.TO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 24.99%
- 1Y
- 48.00%
- 3Y*
- 31.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ZCS.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMO.TO Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD | 25.71% | 23.20% | 29.68% | 14.93% | -9.09% | 15.67% | 21.39% | 19.55% | -5.19% | 16.81% |
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.29% | 4.41% | 7.42% | 6.67% | -4.48% | -0.76% | 6.10% | 5.01% | 1.23% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMO.TO and ZCS.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2016 | 0.11 |
The correlation between VMO.TO and ZCS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Industrials
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Healthcare
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Technology
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Financial Services
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Basic Materials
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Energy
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Communication Services
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Real Estate
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
Utilities
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VMO.TO
ZCS.TO
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD (VMO.TO) and BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMO.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 2.44 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.35 | 9.64 | +9.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMO.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 1.95 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.53%, which is greater than ZCS.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMO.TO and ZCS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMO.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -13.95% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -1.63% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -1.63% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.27% | -7.76% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -0.89% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 0.41% | +2.08% |
Volatility
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD (VMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that VMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMO.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 0.69% | +5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 1.79% | +13.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 2.05% | +17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 2.87% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 4.38% | +13.53% |
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMO.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCS.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMO.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Dividend Comparison
VMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ZCS.TO's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMO.TO Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF CAD | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 1.65% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 1.70% | 0.80% | 1.15% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.93% | 3.60% | 3.27% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.99% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 2.88% | 3.04% | 3.34% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMO.TO and ZCS.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCS.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCS.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for VMO.TO.
VMO.TO is categorized as Momentum, while ZCS.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VMO.TO and 0.11% for ZCS.TO.
Find the right allocation for VMO.TO and ZCS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer