PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF (VMO.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMO.TO achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 1.00% return.


VMO.TO

1D
0.74%
1M
-8.77%
6M
8.36%
YTD
16.22%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
13.69%
ALL TIME*
14.76%

HSAV.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
0.02%
6M
1.02%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
3.33%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$2.70MCA$3.14MCA$3.94M
CA$978.15KCA$1.22MCA$1.24M

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
16.22%21.72%29.69%14.95%-9.07%15.69%14.78%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
1.00%2.58%4.24%5.04%2.79%0.66%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VMO.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMO.TO
VMO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VMO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VMO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF (VMO.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMO.TOHSAV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.20

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

7.91

-0.52

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMO.TO and HSAV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.53%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMO.TO and HSAV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMO.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-2.18%

-28.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-0.59%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-1.06%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-2.18%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-0.22%

-11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-0.19%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

0.24%

+3.42%

Volatility

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF (VMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.31%. This indicates that VMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMO.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

0.31%

+8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.42%

0.94%

+18.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.93%

1.39%

+21.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

1.78%

+16.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

1.56%

+17.69%

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMO.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

VMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMO.TO
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF
0.73%0.85%0.90%1.04%1.67%1.11%0.71%1.71%0.81%1.17%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMO.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for VMO.TO.

VMO.TO is categorized as Momentum, while HSAV.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VMO.TO and 0.18% for HSAV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMO.TO and HSAV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer