VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO
VMO.TO (Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF) and HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMO.TO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while HSAV.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMO.TO returned 15.19%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for HSAV.TO. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VMO.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSAV.TO.
Performance
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMO.TO achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 1.00% return.
VMO.TO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.76%
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$2.70M | CA$3.14M | CA$3.94M | |
| CA$978.15K | CA$1.22M | CA$1.24M |
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMO.TO Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF | 16.22% | 21.72% | 29.69% | 14.95% | -9.07% | 15.69% | 14.78% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.00% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMO.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VMO.TO
HSAV.TO
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF (VMO.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMO.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.20 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 7.91 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.53%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMO.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMO.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -2.18% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -0.59% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -1.06% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -2.18% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -0.22% | -11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -0.19% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 0.24% | +3.42% |
Volatility
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF (VMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.31%. This indicates that VMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMO.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 0.31% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.42% | 0.94% | +18.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.93% | 1.39% | +21.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 1.78% | +16.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 1.56% | +17.69% |
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMO.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMO.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
VMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMO.TO Vanguard Global Momentum Factor ETF | 0.73% | 0.85% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 0.71% | 1.71% | 0.81% | 1.17% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMO.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for VMO.TO.
VMO.TO is categorized as Momentum, while HSAV.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VMO.TO and 0.18% for HSAV.TO.
Find the right allocation for VMO.TO and HSAV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer