PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMNFX vs. PRFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VMNFX having a 12.03% return and PRFDX slightly lower at 11.87%. Over the past 10 years, VMNFX has underperformed PRFDX with an annualized return of 5.00%, while PRFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


VMNFX

1D
0.38%
1M
0.77%
YTD
12.03%
6M
13.70%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
5.00%

PRFDX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.91%
YTD
11.87%
6M
13.88%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
12.03%9.27%5.78%12.23%13.48%23.24%-11.58%-9.57%0.60%-4.89%
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
11.87%14.60%11.85%9.75%-3.25%25.60%1.28%33.66%-9.29%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VMNFX and PRFDX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1998

-0.01

The correlation between VMNFX and PRFDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.09 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMNFX vs. PRFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMNFX
VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFDX
PRFDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PRFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMNFXPRFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.29

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

12.24

-1.85

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the PRFDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMNFX and PRFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMNFXPRFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.27

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.80

0.64

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.66

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.61

-0.27

Drawdowns

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMNFX drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, smaller than the maximum PRFDX drawdown of -58.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMNFX and PRFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMNFXPRFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-58.12%

+31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-7.34%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-14.35%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.75%

-18.08%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-39.71%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-6.26%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.96%

-0.21%

Volatility

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) is 1.99%, while T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that VMNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMNFXPRFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.99%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

8.01%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

10.65%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

14.93%

-7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

17.87%

-11.48%

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMNFX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMNFX vs. PRFDX - Dividend Comparison

VMNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than PRFDX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
2.44%2.76%8.91%6.19%6.61%8.78%3.55%12.53%11.43%8.97%7.75%7.48%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
3.13%3.53%5.61%5.09%0.75%0.16%0.81%3.16%0.94%1.07%0.38%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMNFX and PRFDX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFDX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VMNFX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMNFX dropped -26.42% vs PRFDX's -58.12%.

PRFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMNFX and PRFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer