PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMNFX vs. CRIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMNFX achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than CRIHX's 13.87% return.


VMNFX

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.67%
YTD
13.03%
6M
13.52%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
5.10%

CRIHX

1D
2.26%
1M
5.55%
YTD
13.87%
6M
13.24%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
13.03%9.27%5.78%12.23%13.48%23.24%-11.58%-9.57%0.60%-4.89%
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
13.87%-1.55%17.72%6.06%-4.24%5.91%20.44%12.95%-8.43%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VMNFX and CRIHX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2016

0.08

The correlation between VMNFX and CRIHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMNFX vs. CRIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMNFX
VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CRIHX
CRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMNFXCRIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

2.48

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

7.57

+5.07

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the CRIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMNFX and CRIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMNFX drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, which is greater than CRIHX's maximum drawdown of -21.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMNFX and CRIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMNFXCRIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-21.33%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-9.07%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-15.87%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.75%

-15.87%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-4.11%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.96%

-1.30%

Volatility

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) is 1.94%, while CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that VMNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMNFXCRIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

6.02%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

10.40%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

13.80%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

11.30%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

11.17%

-4.78%

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMNFX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CRIHX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMNFX vs. CRIHX - Dividend Comparison

VMNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while CRIHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%8.11%2.32%1.55%0.75%8.83%0.03%1.75%0.24%0.00%0.00%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
3.11%3.53%5.61%5.09%0.75%0.16%0.81%3.16%0.94%1.07%0.38%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMNFX and CRIHX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRIHX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to VMNFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMNFX dropped -26.42% vs CRIHX's -21.33%.

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMNFX and CRIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer