PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMMSX vs. VMNFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VMMSX having a 15.71% return and VMNFX slightly higher at 15.75%. Over the past 10 years, VMMSX has outperformed VMNFX with an annualized return of 9.66%, while VMNFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.42% annualized return.


VMMSX

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.46%
6M
9.73%
YTD
15.71%
1Y
34.74%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
9.66%

VMNFX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.15%
6M
18.55%
YTD
15.75%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
15.71%35.68%5.91%10.58%-18.15%-1.40%15.79%21.42%-12.53%32.01%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
15.75%9.27%5.78%12.23%13.48%23.24%-11.58%-9.57%0.60%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VMMSX and VMNFX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2011

-0.00

The correlation between VMMSX and VMNFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (5 years) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMMSX
VMNFX

Technology

23.4%
4.2%

Financial Services

18.8%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
-1.1%

Industrials

7.0%
-3.8%

Communication Services

6.6%
-0.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
-1.0%

Energy

5.5%
0.3%

Utilities

2.1%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Healthcare

1.3%
-0.5%

Technology

VMMSX
23.4%
VMNFX
4.2%

Financial Services

VMMSX
18.8%
VMNFX
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VMMSX
13.4%
VMNFX
-1.1%

Industrials

VMMSX
7.0%
VMNFX
-3.8%

Communication Services

VMMSX
6.6%
VMNFX
-0.8%

Basic Materials

VMMSX
6.1%
VMNFX
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VMMSX
5.9%
VMNFX
-1.0%

Energy

VMMSX
5.5%
VMNFX
0.3%

Utilities

VMMSX
2.1%
VMNFX
0.0%

Real Estate

VMMSX
1.9%
VMNFX
0.1%

Healthcare

VMMSX
1.3%
VMNFX
-0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMMSX vs. VMNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMMSX
VMMSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VMMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VMMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VMNFX
VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMMSXVMNFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

5.17

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

16.46

-7.24

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the VMNFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMMSX and VMNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMMSX drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, which is greater than VMNFX's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMMSX and VMNFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMMSXVMNFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-26.42%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-4.65%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-5.44%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-6.75%

-28.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-25.09%

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

0.00%

-4.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-8.73%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

1.47%

+2.27%

Volatility

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) at 2.43%. This indicates that VMMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMMSXVMNFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

2.43%

+4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

5.91%

+10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

7.88%

+10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

7.23%

+10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

6.42%

+12.01%

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMMSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than VMNFX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMMSX vs. VMNFX - Dividend Comparison

VMMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than VMNFX's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
2.00%2.32%3.33%3.05%3.71%6.80%1.04%2.04%2.53%1.54%1.44%1.87%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
3.03%3.53%5.61%5.09%0.75%0.16%0.81%3.16%0.94%1.07%0.38%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMMSX and VMNFX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMMSX has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to VMNFX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMMSX dropped -39.28% vs VMNFX's -26.42%.

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMMSX and VMNFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer