VMMSX vs. CNWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX).
VMMSX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Jun 27, 2011. CNWIX is managed by Calamos.
Performance
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMMSX Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund | 3.63% | 35.68% | 5.91% | 10.58% | -18.15% | -1.40% | 15.79% | 21.42% | -12.53% | 32.01% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 7.40% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMMSX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 7.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMMSX having a 9.07% annualized return and CNWIX not far behind at 8.63%.
VMMSX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
CNWIX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMMSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VMMSX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
VMMSX
CNWIX
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMMSX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.53 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.96 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.87 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 7.15 | +2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMMSX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.53 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.36 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMMSX and CNWIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison
VMMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than CNWIX's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMMSX Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund | 2.24% | 2.32% | 3.33% | 3.05% | 3.71% | 6.80% | 1.04% | 2.04% | 2.53% | 1.54% | 1.44% | 1.87% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMMSX drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, smaller than the maximum CNWIX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMMSX and CNWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMMSX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -43.57% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.46% | -16.28% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.39% | -37.47% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.82% | -43.57% | +4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -14.20% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.53% | -16.56% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 4.26% | -0.87% |
Volatility
VMMSX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) is 8.89%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that VMMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMMSX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 11.15% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 17.00% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 20.27% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.56% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 24.08% | -5.79% |