VMGIX vs. VMVAX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VMGIX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund) and VMVAX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both mutual funds - VMGIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while VMVAX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, VMGIX returned 11.36%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for VMVAX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VMGIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VMVAX.

Performance

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMGIX achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than VMVAX's 16.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VMGIX has outperformed VMVAX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while VMVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.

VMGIX

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: 6.94%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 4.71%
• 10Y*: 11.36%
• ALL TIME*: 9.80%

VMVAX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 12.16%
• YTD: 16.91%
• 1Y: 26.28%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: 10.77%
• ALL TIME*: 12.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VMGIX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VMVAX Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMGIX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund	5.95%	10.56%	15.51%	23.79%	-28.93%	20.32%	34.30%	33.69%	-5.73%	21.72%
VMVAX Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares	16.91%	12.06%	13.63%	10.12%	-7.89%	28.77%	2.45%	28.03%	-12.44%	17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VMGIX and VMVAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between VMGIX and VMVAX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VMGIX	VMVAX
Technology	33.8%	8.1%
Industrials	26.7%	13.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	5.9%
Healthcare	8.0%	7.2%
Financial Services	6.0%	18.7%
Real Estate	4.2%	5.8%
Communication Services	3.0%	1.5%
Utilities	2.9%	12.6%
Energy	1.8%	11.7%
Basic Materials	1.6%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	7.6%

Return for Risk

VMGIX vs. VMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMGIX

VMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
VMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
VMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
VMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
VMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
VMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

VMVAX

VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMGIX	VMVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	2.19	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	3.18	-2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.39	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	3.58	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	13.96	-13.69

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the VMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMGIX and VMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMGIX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than VMVAX's maximum drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGIX and VMVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMGIX	VMVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.20%	-43.07%	-17.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.99%	-6.95%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.67%	-18.40%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.25%	-19.75%	-17.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.25%	-43.07%	+5.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.77%	-1.07%	-2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-4.33%	-5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	1.78%	+3.65%

Volatility

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) at 2.69%. This indicates that VMGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMGIX	VMVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.69%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	8.12%	+5.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	11.39%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	15.88%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	18.69%	+2.34%

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMGIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVAX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VMGIX vs. VMVAX - Dividend Comparison

VMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VMVAX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VMGIX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.49%	0.52%	0.56%	0.60%	0.64%	0.23%	0.46%	0.67%	0.70%	0.61%	0.70%	0.69%
VMVAX Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares	1.81%	2.10%	2.11%	2.26%	2.27%	1.78%	2.36%	2.08%	2.75%	1.86%	1.91%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMGIX and VMVAX in my portfolio?

VMGIX and VMVAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMGIX or VMVAX?

VMGIX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to VMVAX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGIX dropped -60.20% vs VMVAX's -43.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.