PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMGIX vs. NEEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMGIX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than NEEIX's 62.40% return.


VMGIX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.31%
YTD
10.07%
6M
8.15%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
12.60%

NEEIX

1D
3.86%
1M
10.66%
YTD
62.40%
6M
59.28%
1Y
96.29%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMGIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund
10.07%10.56%15.51%23.79%-28.93%20.32%34.30%33.69%-5.73%21.72%
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
62.40%9.32%19.26%27.30%-33.26%28.13%42.39%43.15%-10.13%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VMGIX and NEEIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.85

The correlation between VMGIX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMGIX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMGIX
VMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEIX
NEEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMGIXNEEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.51

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

7.28

-6.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

24.26

-21.80

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the NEEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMGIX and NEEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMGIX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than NEEIX's maximum drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGIX and NEEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMGIXNEEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-43.11%

-17.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-13.22%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-36.13%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.25%

-43.11%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-10.82%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.96%

+1.40%

Volatility

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund (VMGIX) is 6.71%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 13.03%. This indicates that VMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMGIXNEEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

13.03%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

23.11%

-9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

28.86%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

28.71%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

25.98%

-4.91%

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMGIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMGIX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison

VMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than NEEIX's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
4.41%7.16%7.48%0.00%1.72%6.70%5.58%11.09%17.58%9.64%0.00%0.00%
VMGIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.49%0.52%0.56%0.60%0.64%0.23%0.46%0.67%0.70%0.61%0.70%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMGIX and NEEIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEIX has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to VMGIX (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGIX dropped -60.20% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.

NEEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMGIX and NEEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer