PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMAX vs. BGIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMAX vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMAX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 9.84% return.


VMAX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.11%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.50%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.82%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.56%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMAX vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
12.22%15.65%15.89%6.98%
BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
9.84%12.49%16.84%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VMAX and BGIG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.79

The correlation between VMAX and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMAX vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMAX
BGIG

Financial Services

33.3%
14.8%

Energy

12.3%
11.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
14.6%

Technology

10.8%
24.6%

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Utilities

5.7%
7.9%

Industrials

5.6%
10.6%

Real Estate

4.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
5.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.6%

Financial Services

VMAX
33.3%
BGIG
14.8%

Energy

VMAX
12.3%
BGIG
11.2%

Healthcare

VMAX
11.0%
BGIG
14.6%

Technology

VMAX
10.8%
BGIG
24.6%

Communication Services

VMAX
6.7%
BGIG

-

Utilities

VMAX
5.7%
BGIG
7.9%

Industrials

VMAX
5.6%
BGIG
10.6%

Real Estate

VMAX
4.3%
BGIG
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VMAX
3.9%
BGIG
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VMAX
3.7%
BGIG
5.4%

Basic Materials

VMAX
2.8%
BGIG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMAX vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMAX
VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BGIG
BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMAX vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMAXBGIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

3.37

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

12.97

+6.58

VMAX vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMAX and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMAXBGIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.18

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Drawdowns

VMAX vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMAX drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMAX and BGIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMAXBGIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-13.24%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-5.81%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.28%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-1.70%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

1.51%

-0.11%

Volatility

VMAX vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMAXBGIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.57%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

6.72%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

9.00%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

11.94%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

11.94%

+3.51%

VMAX vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMAX vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

VMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than BGIG's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
1.75%1.89%2.02%0.78%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
1.91%2.14%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMAX and BGIG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGIG has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to VMAX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMAX dropped -19.05% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 27.28% vs 19.51% for BGIG. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 27.28% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.75% for BGIG.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VMAX and 0.45% for BGIG.

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMAX and BGIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer