VLVLY vs. TM
VLVLY (Volvo AB ADR) and TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) are both stocks. VLVLY operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while TM operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, VLVLY returned 21.64%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for TM. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VLVLY vs. TM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLVLY achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VLVLY has outperformed TM with an annualized return of 21.64%, while TM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.
VLVLY
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 41.53%
- 3Y*
- 27.55%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- 21.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.90%
TM
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- 6M
- -16.69%
- YTD
- -11.71%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.54M | $83.60M | $92.51M | |
VLVLY Volvo AB ADR | $3.57M | $4.33M | $5.79M |
VLVLY vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLVLY Volvo AB ADR | 24.91% | 40.70% | -1.07% | 53.43% | -15.39% | 11.22% | 56.05% | 36.41% | -27.35% | 63.49% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -11.71% | 13.82% | 8.88% | 38.23% | -24.43% | 23.21% | 13.62% | 22.69% | -5.81% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLVLY and TM is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2016 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
VLVLY:
$77.87B
TM:
$223.78B
VLVLY:
SEK 17.63
TM:
¥2.98K
VLVLY:
20.73
TM:
10.18
VLVLY:
4.73
TM:
0.53
VLVLY:
1.58
TM:
0.77
VLVLY:
4.21
TM:
0.99
VLVLY:
SEK 471.53B
TM:
¥51.16T
VLVLY:
SEK 119.49B
TM:
¥8.54T
VLVLY:
SEK 74.26B
TM:
¥7.11T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLVLY vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank
VLVLY
TM
VLVLY vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volvo AB ADR (VLVLY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLVLY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.22 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 0.47 | +4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLVLY vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLVLY drawdown since its inception was -50.35%, smaller than the maximum TM drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLVLY and TM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLVLY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.35% | -60.15% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.99% | -32.94% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.55% | -34.92% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -36.80% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.35% | -36.80% | -13.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -23.88% | +23.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -22.20% | +9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 15.34% | -6.72% |
Volatility
VLVLY vs. TM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Volvo AB ADR (VLVLY) is 6.51%, while Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that VLVLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLVLY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 7.49% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.44% | 20.17% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.93% | 26.56% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 27.16% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.89% | 23.66% | +8.23% |
Dividends
VLVLY vs. TM - Dividend Comparison
VLVLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than TM's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.52% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
VLVLY Volvo AB ADR | 3.79% | 5.27% | 7.14% | 5.04% | 7.66% | 12.75% | 5.59% | 6.50% | 4.10% | 1.94% | 3.17% | 0.00% |
Financials
VLVLY vs. TM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Volvo AB ADR and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VLVLY vs. TM - Profitability Comparison
VLVLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Volvo AB ADR reported a gross profit of 32.45B and revenue of 126.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.
TM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
VLVLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Volvo AB ADR reported an operating income of 13.34B and revenue of 126.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
TM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
VLVLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Volvo AB ADR reported a net income of 10.37B and revenue of 126.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
TM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VLVLY and TM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TM has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to VLVLY (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLVLY dropped -50.35% vs TM's -60.15%.
VLVLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLVLY and TM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer