PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLPIX vs. RMLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLPIX achieves a 25.37% return, which is significantly lower than RMLPX's 33.65% return.


VLPIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.94%
6M
26.58%
YTD
25.37%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
22.59%
10Y*
11.94%

RMLPX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.17%
6M
32.04%
YTD
33.65%
1Y
37.07%
3Y*
28.67%
5Y*
25.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
25.37%3.49%41.45%11.99%30.81%44.75%-18.60%9.59%-17.20%
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund
33.65%8.98%30.03%16.79%35.03%42.56%-28.37%15.33%-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VLPIX and RMLPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.94

The correlation between VLPIX and RMLPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLPIX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLPIX
VLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RMLPX
RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLPIXRMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

4.18

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

11.07

+0.97

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLPIX and RMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLPIX drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, roughly equal to the maximum RMLPX drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLPIX and RMLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLPIXRMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-66.95%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-9.09%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-18.75%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.26%

-22.83%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-4.27%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-10.20%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.42%

-0.81%

Volatility

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund (VLPIX) is 5.26%, while Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that VLPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLPIXRMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.26%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

13.74%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

16.77%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

21.35%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

27.96%

-3.38%

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLPIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLPIX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison

VLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than RMLPX's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund
4.87%6.38%7.63%6.49%7.08%8.89%13.48%7.25%5.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLPIX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Energy Fund
7.81%9.63%2.61%3.32%3.01%3.66%5.40%4.28%4.04%2.81%2.50%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLPIX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMLPX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to VLPIX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLPIX dropped -64.56% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.

RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLPIX and RMLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer