VLLU vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VLLU (Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLLU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. VLLU is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, VLLU returned 25.99% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VLLU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

VLLU vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLLU achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

VLLU

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 6.81%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: 25.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLLU vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	11.69%	17.35%	2.68%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VLLU and CSHP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.01

The correlation between VLLU and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VLLU vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLLU	CSHP
Financial Services	27.0%	0.1%
Technology	23.8%	-
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Energy	9.4%	-
Industrials	7.3%	-
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VLLU vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLLU

VLLU Risk / Return Rank: 76
VLLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VLLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VLLU Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VLLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VLLU Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLLU vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLLU	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	11.91	-9.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	31.26	-27.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	7.44	-6.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	65.71	-61.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.10	432.16	-417.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLLU vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLLU and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLLU	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	11.91	-9.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	10.75	-9.49

Drawdowns

VLLU vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLLU drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLLU and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLLU	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-0.08%	-16.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-0.06%	-6.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-0.00%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.01%	+1.72%

Volatility

VLLU vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that VLLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLLU	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	0.07%	+3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	0.24%	+7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.02%	0.33%	+10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	0.40%	+14.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	0.40%	+14.45%

VLLU vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLLU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLLU vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

VLLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	1.36%	1.52%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLLU and CSHP in my portfolio?

VLLU and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLLU or CSHP?

VLLU has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLLU dropped -16.62% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, VLLU or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, VLLU leads with 25.99% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLLU or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, VLLU has performed better with a 25.99% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLLU or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VLLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLLU or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.36% for VLLU.

What is the main difference between VLLU and CSHP?

VLLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VLLU and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.