PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLISX vs. VBTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLISX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLISX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than VBTLX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VLISX has outperformed VBTLX with an annualized return of 15.66%, while VBTLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


VLISX

1D
0.18%
1M
5.98%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.40%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.66%

VBTLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.35%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLISX
Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.50%18.11%25.12%27.26%-19.68%27.04%21.04%31.38%-4.47%22.04%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.42%7.17%1.26%5.74%-13.16%-1.81%7.72%8.73%-0.25%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VLISX and VBTLX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

-0.17

The correlation between VLISX and VBTLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLISX vs. VBTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLISX
VLISX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VLISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VLISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTLX
VBTLX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VBTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLISX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLISXVBTLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.86

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

5.58

+9.21

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLISX and VBTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLISXVBTLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.36

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.04

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.32

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.76

-0.17

Drawdowns

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLISX drawdown since its inception was -54.48%, which is greater than VBTLX's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLISX and VBTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLISXVBTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.48%

-18.81%

-35.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-2.89%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-6.00%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.65%

-18.14%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-18.81%

-15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.18%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-2.67%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

0.96%

+1.04%

Volatility

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VLISX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) at 1.38%. This indicates that VLISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLISXVBTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.38%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

2.80%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

3.97%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

6.01%

+11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

4.98%

+13.22%

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VLISX and VBTLX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLISX vs. VBTLX - Dividend Comparison

VLISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than VBTLX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.98%3.87%3.69%3.10%2.59%1.96%2.39%2.74%2.57%2.56%2.53%2.82%
VLISX
Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.97%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.67%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.76%1.99%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLISX and VBTLX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLISX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to VBTLX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLISX dropped -54.48% vs VBTLX's -18.81%.

VLISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLISX and VBTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer