PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLCGX vs. CPEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLCGX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than CPEAX's 25.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VLCGX has underperformed CPEAX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while CPEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.


VLCGX

1D
0.17%
1M
5.00%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.89%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
11.51%

CPEAX

1D
2.45%
1M
12.89%
YTD
25.92%
6M
23.66%
1Y
40.39%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLCGX
VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund
9.13%-13.56%16.33%23.73%-18.84%26.09%23.00%39.89%-4.04%28.56%
CPEAX
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund
25.92%9.98%22.02%13.44%-14.87%19.59%21.00%11.14%-4.35%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VLCGX and CPEAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2011

0.82

The correlation between VLCGX and CPEAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLCGX vs. CPEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLCGX
VLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CPEAX
CPEAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CPEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CPEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLCGXCPEAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.88

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

2.56

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.25

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.80

12.09

-3.29

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CPEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLCGX and CPEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLCGXCPEAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.88

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.66

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.64

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.75

-0.44

Drawdowns

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLCGX drawdown since its inception was -52.12%, which is greater than CPEAX's maximum drawdown of -34.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLCGX and CPEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLCGXCPEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.12%

-34.39%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-12.61%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-26.28%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-26.28%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-34.39%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.35%

0.00%

-9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-5.30%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.39%

-1.01%

Volatility

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) is 3.05%, while Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that VLCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLCGXCPEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

9.34%

-6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

18.16%

-8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

21.79%

-9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

20.26%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

20.65%

-0.40%

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLCGX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CPEAX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLCGX vs. CPEAX - Dividend Comparison

VLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, less than CPEAX's 12.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPEAX
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund
12.50%15.75%9.57%0.00%1.21%30.88%0.00%0.12%19.37%2.32%0.00%1.36%
VLCGX
VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund
9.57%0.00%6.08%9.19%13.16%8.61%6.80%6.20%0.63%3.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLCGX and CPEAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPEAX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to VLCGX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLCGX dropped -52.12% vs CPEAX's -34.39%.

CPEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLCGX and CPEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer