VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO
VLB.TO (Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF) and ZFL.TO (BMO Long Federal Bond) are both exchange-traded funds - VLB.TO is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian 10+ Year Float Adjusted Bond Index, while ZFL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VLB.TO returned -1.62%/yr vs -3.89%/yr for ZFL.TO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLB.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for ZFL.TO.
Performance
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLB.TO achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than ZFL.TO's 2.39% return.
VLB.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ZFL.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- -0.83%
- 3Y*
- -0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- -1.37%
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLB.TO Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF | 2.84% | -1.07% | 0.69% | 9.27% | -21.79% | -4.94% | 9.88% | 11.93% | -0.45% | 6.88% |
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | 2.39% | -5.14% | -2.20% | 7.30% | -23.89% | -7.47% | 12.68% | 8.73% | 2.69% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLB.TO and ZFL.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VLB.TO and ZFL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VLB.TO
ZFL.TO
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLB.TO | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.99 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | -0.12 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | -0.22 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLB.TO | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | -0.09 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.27 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.16 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum ZFL.TO drawdown of -40.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLB.TO and ZFL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLB.TO | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -40.32% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -6.68% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.17% | -14.51% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.90% | -32.25% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.35% | -31.87% | +11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -12.45% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.82% | -1.22% |
Volatility
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) is 2.98%, while BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that VLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZFL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLB.TO | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.14% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.21% | 7.05% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.42% | 9.72% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 14.71% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 12.54% | -1.33% |
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLB.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFL.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Dividend Comparison
VLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than ZFL.TO's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLB.TO Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF | 3.88% | 3.96% | 3.78% | 3.47% | 3.75% | 2.95% | 2.80% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | 2.84% | 3.13% | 3.20% | 3.49% | 3.77% | 2.85% | 2.57% | 2.95% | 3.00% | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VLB.TO and ZFL.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VLB.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZFL.TO.
VLB.TO is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while ZFL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. VLB.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian 10+ Year Float Adjusted Bond Index, while ZFL.TO tracks FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLB.TO and 0.22% for ZFL.TO.
Find the right allocation for VLB.TO and ZFL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer