PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLB.TO achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than ZFL.TO's 2.39% return.


VLB.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.76%
YTD
2.84%
6M
0.71%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*

ZFL.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.93%
YTD
2.39%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
-0.83%
3Y*
-0.42%
5Y*
-3.89%
10Y*
-1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF
2.84%-1.07%0.69%9.27%-21.79%-4.94%9.88%11.93%-0.45%6.88%
ZFL.TO
BMO Long Federal Bond
2.39%-5.14%-2.20%7.30%-23.89%-7.47%12.68%8.73%2.69%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VLB.TO and ZFL.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

0.88

The correlation between VLB.TO and ZFL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLB.TO
VLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ZFL.TO
ZFL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ZFL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLB.TOZFL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.99

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

-0.12

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.98

-0.22

+1.20

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the ZFL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLB.TO and ZFL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLB.TOZFL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.09

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.27

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.16

-0.08

Drawdowns

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum ZFL.TO drawdown of -40.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLB.TO and ZFL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLB.TOZFL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-40.32%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-6.68%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-14.51%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-32.25%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.35%

-31.87%

+11.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-12.45%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.82%

-1.22%

Volatility

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) is 2.98%, while BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that VLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZFL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLB.TOZFL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.14%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

7.05%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.42%

9.72%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

14.71%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

12.54%

-1.33%

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLB.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFL.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Dividend Comparison

VLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than ZFL.TO's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF
3.88%3.96%3.78%3.47%3.75%2.95%2.80%2.84%3.43%2.82%0.00%0.00%
ZFL.TO
BMO Long Federal Bond
2.84%3.13%3.20%3.49%3.77%2.85%2.57%2.95%3.00%2.99%3.05%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VLB.TO and ZFL.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VLB.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZFL.TO.

VLB.TO is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while ZFL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. VLB.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian 10+ Year Float Adjusted Bond Index, while ZFL.TO tracks FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLB.TO and 0.22% for ZFL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLB.TO and ZFL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer