PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VJPU.L is traded in USD, while ZPDS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPDS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDS.DE's 6.26% return.


VJPU.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.90%
YTD
19.64%
6M
21.88%
1Y
53.34%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
10Y*

ZPDS.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
6.26%
6M
6.92%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
19.64%31.52%23.80%35.64%1.68%
ZPDS.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
6.26%2.84%13.49%-2.08%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.11

The correlation between VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDS.DE
ZPDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VJPU.LZPDS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.04

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

0.23

+5.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.73

0.49

+19.24

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VJPU.LZPDS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

0.16

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.53

+0.96

Drawdowns

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than ZPDS.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VJPU.LZPDS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.40%

-24.04%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-9.32%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.40%

-12.86%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-8.08%

+7.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-4.29%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

4.36%

-1.66%

Volatility

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) is 3.82%, while SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that VJPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VJPU.LZPDS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

5.74%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

11.21%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.86%

13.79%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

13.45%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

13.85%

+5.60%

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VJPU.L vs. ZPDS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPU.L nor ZPDS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

VJPU.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while ZPDS.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.15% for ZPDS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VJPU.L and ZPDS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer